AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Carbon capture and storage companies us3/10/2024 Climate scientists say the world needs to rapidly reduce its use of fossil fuels like oil and natural gas to limit the devastating impacts caused by climate change.Ĭarbon capture and storage often doesn't work well, says Bruce Robertson, an independent energy finance analyst. "If people found themselves in trouble, they may have a hard time calling for help," she says.Īnd some researchers and environmental groups are concerned that the carbon capture and storage technology behind the proposed rule change is being used to extend the life of fossil fuel operations. Bogdan Tejeda notes that often in national forests, there is bad cell service. "The thing about CO2 is it's a deadly asphyxiant, whether it leaks near a town or whether it leaks near a forest," Bogdan Tejeda says.ĬO2 is an odorless gas, making it harder to detect, and plumes can spread for miles. Pipeline ruptures could pose a threat for people recreating in forests – plus wildlife, says Victoria Bogdan Tejeda, attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity. Some of those people report they are still suffering from lingering health issues. In 2020, a CO2 pipeline ruptured in Satartia, Mississippi, sending at least 45 people to the hospital. If a pipeline breaks, CO2 can displace oxygen, and the plume can be hazardous to humans and anything else that breathes, says Bill Caram, executive director of the nonprofit watchdog group Pipeline Safety Trust. Sekera says building those CO2 pipelines may require clearing a lot of trees.Īnd there are concerns about pipeline safety. "All this huge industrial infrastructure that's going to go right through." "To get the CO2 to the injection site in the midst of our national forest, they've got to build huge pipelines," Sekera says. "Authorizing carbon capture and storage on NFS lands would support the Administration's goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent below the 2005 levels by 2030," the proposed rule change says.īut environmental groups and researchers have concerns.Ĭarbon dioxide (CO2) pollution will still need to be transported to the forests via industrial pipeline for storage, says June Sekera, a research fellow with Boston University. Forest Service is proposing to change a rule to allow storing this carbon dioxide pollution under the country's national forests and grasslands.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |